Nyhet -

Debate: Chemicals tax in Sweden hampers innovation. Here is how to fix it.

The new chemicals legislation proposed by the Swedish government has been marketed as an effort to reduce the use of hazardous chemicals in our home environment. The proposal unfortunately misses crucial points in how to achieve this and instead of distinguishing between hazardous substances, it targets certain functions that are perceived as particularly risky - one of which is flame retardants. In an attempt to be progressive the Swedish government has managed to equally punish all flame retardant technologies, including some halogen-free technologies that are generally viewed as safe. The consequence is a failure of the legislation to drive change. The legislation will instead likely create a locking in of existing technologies.

Paxymer has been involved in the debate regarding the new chemicals legislation. An initial article in SvD, one of Swedens leading daily newspapers, during the summer sparked the debate. In the latest NyTeknik, Swedens leading weekly technical magazine, Amit Paul, Managing Director and Ann-Christin Paul, Chairman of the board proposes some simple points on how to improve the legislation's environmental effects.

Paxymer proposes three simple changes to the legislation that will increase its environmental impact and potentially achieve substitution of hazardous chemicals for better alternatives.

  • Shift the focus away from functionality and focus on hazardous substances.
  • Use existing classification systems as a base for the taxation. This will minimise sub-optimisation and simplify follow-up.
  • Create a clear timeline/deadlines for when and what substances will be taxed.

It is not too late to amend the legislation and make it more functional. These changes would give the market incentive to use less hazardous substances and Sweden would once again drive the agenda towards the use of more sustainable technologies. However it requires a pragmatic debate from the industry and resolute action from the Swedish politicians. It's not too late.

To read the full article in Swedish please click this link. [Sv]

The initial article in SvD Debatt [Sv]

Relaterade länkar

Ämnen

  • Natur-, miljövård

Kategorier

  • halogenfritt
  • miljö
  • innovation
  • substitution
  • kemikaliskatten

Kontakter

Relaterat innehåll

  • Paxymer part of "The bigger picture"

    "The bigger picture" is the newest report by Chemsec including a number of innovative companies such as ​Paxymer, Apple, Skanska and Organoclick. It looks at substitution through case studies. The report shows the true benefits and costs of substitution. The conclusion is clear: benefits outweigh the costs of new sustainable products.

  • Swedish startup gives webinar on greener flame retardants

    ​Paxymer, FRX Polymers and Massachusetts Toxics Use reduction Institute gives webinar on "Greener Flame retardants". The webinar is hosted by the GC3 and targeted to companies aiming to take control of their use of hazardous materials. It is the first in a series about innovative green materials and and technologies.

  • Paxymer newsletter September 2014: Dioxin conference

    The conference Dixon 2014, the 34th annual symposium on Dioxins and Dioxin identification, was filled with creative and interesting discussions. It is clear that new alternatives has to be put into use in the near future and this is agreed upon by scientists, NGOs, policy makers and industry alike. Paxymer was one of the invited SMEs, involved in the “Sustainable production and use” seminar.

  • Paxymer newsletter May 2014: Substitution for the better

    This newsletter address one of our favorite topics here at Paxymer: substitution of hazardous chemicals. The topics are: Fire safety in Electronics, What hides in Seabird Eggs, Do you know what your Product actually contains? Substitute for the better Triphosphate flame retardants in Indoor dust, California's safer Consumer Product regulation is moving forward.